What do we call this thing?
Is it a bot? AI? ChatGPT? An Agent? Something else?
Users deserve to know what or who they are interacting with. In environments where a user is knowingly interacting with AI, this may not be as critical. However, consider being onboarded into a new company, and you learn you are interacting with a third-party AI agent, not someone on your team. Or, perhaps you are sharing personal information in a therapy session and you realize the "person" on the other end is AI.
This is a ambiguous pattern. We should expect to see companies play around with proprietary names, possibly keeping terms like AI associated with the bot to make it clear who the person is. For example, Intercom has named their AI Fin, though they always include a disclosure badge to make it clear the user is interacting with an AI bot.
Here are a few other examples in the wild today:
- Klarna: AI Assistant (Ask our AI assistant)
- Notion: AI (Ask AI)
- Leena: Leena.ai
- Github: Copilot (Ask copilot)As naming conventions sort themselves out, a smaller pattern is emerging that adds a badge to the AI or the interface to making it clear when you are interacting with AI versus a human.
Currently this pattern is converging around four approaches:
- AI as a persona: Give the AI a name
- Intercom: Fin
- Character.ai: Gives each character a name (Ask Socrates)
- Salesforce: Einstein
- AI as the company: Use the company's name
- Jasper: Jasper (Ask Jasper)
- ChatGPT: ChatGPT (Ask ChatGPT)
- Leena: Leena.ai
- AI as an entity: Give the AI a generic term, like CoPilot or Assistant
- Klarna: AI Assistant (Ask our AI assistant)
- Github: Copilot
- Zapier: Copilot
- AI as a technology:
- Notion: AI (Ask AI)